In the corporate landscape, there are cases of unethical behavior that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that put a spotlight on moral failures. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , falls squarely in the latter category — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that not only taints the reputation of a lone supervisor but casts a shadow over the enterprise’s integrity.
In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has remained in his role , seemingly unaffected by the uproar swirling around him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? According to sources , Collins’ history of questionable behavior was marked by infractions of the business principles, but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it escalated into a chain of concerning actions that has left fellow employees demoralized and stakeholders confused .
While attending a professional growth course — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities —David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a serious training session into a sequence of unprofessional occurrences. It’s reported he spent company-sponsored junkets pursuing romantic liaisons , a glaring violation of Ventia’s business principles , all while his loved ones stayed unaware .
But the indiscretions didn’t end with romantic pursuits . Ventia New Zealand One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged abuse of company IT systems to distribute inappropriate images to women—a significant exploitation of professional tools and a violation of confidentiality . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including symbols celebrating indiscretions— reveals a character of a man apathetic to the fallout. Following these digital advances , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on repeated times during business days , despite his relationship status and her having a committed relationship . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but led to familial breakdowns — leaving a path of mistrust that extended well beyond the workplace .
What reason can this behavior be permitted to go on? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, additional resources stems from a worrisome failure of governance within the organization . Issues have been raised , yet Collins continues unchecked .
This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that rank and influence within the company can serve as a safeguard. It creates a toxic work environment , disheartens staff , and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .